Equatorial Guinea vs South Africa: Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues

Equatorial Guinea
8,093 t
in 2024
South Africa
9,275 t
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
62nd
South Africa rank
60th

Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • South Africa
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k199020072024

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 9,275 t against 8,093 t in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 1,182 t.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was South Africa ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 62nd and South Africa ranks 60th of 218 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 1,862 t 67,253 t 65,392 t South Africa
2000s 924.9 t 46,381 t 45,456 t South Africa
2010s 693.67 t 47,187 t 46,493 t South Africa
2020s 7,630 t 6,724 t 906.1 t Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher humid tropical forest — burning crop residues, Equatorial Guinea or South Africa?
South Africa, at 9,275 t against 8,093 t in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burning crop residues between Equatorial Guinea and South Africa?
1,182 t, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and South Africa?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and South Africa rank globally for humid tropical forest — burning crop residues?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 62nd and South Africa ranks 60th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs South Africa: Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/equatorial-guinea/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/equatorial-guinea/south-africa/">Equatorial Guinea vs South Africa: Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
270 places, 9,224 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.