Australia vs New Caledonia: Humid tropical forest: Burning crop residues … Burning square

Australia
0.1235 t per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
0.2535 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
53rd
New Caledonia rank
50th

Humid tropical forest: Burning crop residues … Burning square over time

  • Australia
  • New Caledonia
01234199020062023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.2535 t per square kilometre against 0.1235 t per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.13 t per square kilometre.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 2.1 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Australia ranks 53rd and New Caledonia ranks 50th of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1363 t per square kilometre 0.9353 t per square kilometre 0.799 t per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 0.1445 t per square kilometre 0.7765 t per square kilometre 0.632 t per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 0.1955 t per square kilometre 0.8173 t per square kilometre 0.6218 t per square kilometre New Caledonia
2020s 0.0836 t per square kilometre 0.0634 t per square kilometre 0.0202 t per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher humid tropical forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry), Australia or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 0.2535 t per square kilometre against 0.1235 t per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry) between Australia and New Caledonia?
0.13 t per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Caledonia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Caledonia rank globally for humid tropical forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry)?
Australia ranks 53rd and New Caledonia ranks 50th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs New Caledonia: Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/australia/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/australia/new-caledonia/">Australia vs New Caledonia: Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 6,179 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.