China vs Kenya: Humid tropical forest: Burning crop residues … Burning square

China
0.0002 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Kenya
0 t per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
59th
Kenya rank
60th

Humid tropical forest: Burning crop residues … Burning square over time

  • China
  • Kenya
00.0050.010.015199020062023

How they compare

China currently reports 0.0002 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Kenya, a difference of 0.0002 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Kenya ahead.

China ranks 59th and Kenya ranks 60th of 185 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Kenya in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Kenya Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0013 t per square kilometre 0.0062 t per square kilometre 0.0049 t per square kilometre Kenya
2000s 0.0028 t per square kilometre 0.0027 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre China
2010s 0.0009 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0007 t per square kilometre China
2020s 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.002 t per square kilometre 0.0017 t per square kilometre Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher humid tropical forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry), China or Kenya?
China, at 0.0002 t per square kilometre against 0 t per square kilometre in Kenya as of 2023.
What is the difference in humid tropical forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry) between China and Kenya?
0.0002 t per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Kenya?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do China and Kenya rank globally for humid tropical forest — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry)?
China ranks 59th and Kenya ranks 60th of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Kenya: Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/china/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/humid-tropical-forest-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-square-kilometre/china/kenya/">China vs Kenya: Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 6,179 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Humid tropical forest — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.