Grenada vs Sri Lanka: Humid tropical forest — Emissions (CH4)
Grenada
0 kt
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 kt
in 2024
Grenada rank
72nd
Sri Lanka rank
72nd
Humid tropical forest — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Grenada
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 72nd and Sri Lanka ranks 72nd of 218 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0003 kt | 0.4696 kt | 0.4693 kt | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0575 kt | 0.0574 kt | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0064 kt | 0.0064 kt | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher humid tropical forest — emissions, Grenada or Sri Lanka?
- Grenada, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in humid tropical forest — emissions between Grenada and Sri Lanka?
- 0 kt, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Sri Lanka?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Grenada and Sri Lanka rank globally for humid tropical forest — emissions?
- Grenada ranks 72nd and Sri Lanka ranks 72nd of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Humid tropical forest — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.