Angola vs Congo: Humid tropical forest — Emissions (CH4), per capita (capita CH4)
Angola
0 kt per person
in 2024
Congo
0 kt per person
in 2024
Angola rank
4th
Congo rank
6th
Humid tropical forest — Emissions (CH4), per capita (capita CH4) over time
- Angola
- Congo
How they compare
Angola currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Congo, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.8 times Congo's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Angola has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 4th and Congo ranks 6th of 185 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Angola |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Angola |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Angola |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher humid tropical forest — emissions (ch4), per capita, Angola or Congo?
- Angola, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in humid tropical forest — emissions (ch4), per capita between Angola and Congo?
- 0 kt per person, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Congo?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Angola and Congo rank globally for humid tropical forest — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Angola ranks 4th and Congo ranks 6th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Humid tropical forest — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Humid tropical forest — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.