Burkina Faso vs Sri Lanka: Humid tropical forest — Emissions
Burkina Faso
0 kt
in 2023
Sri Lanka
0 kt
in 2024
Burkina Faso rank
72nd
Sri Lanka rank
72nd
Humid tropical forest — Emissions over time
- Burkina Faso
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 72nd and Sri Lanka ranks 72nd of 104 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2332 kt | 5.36 kt | 5.13 kt | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0.2073 kt | 4.97 kt | 4.77 kt | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher humid tropical forest — emissions, Burkina Faso or Sri Lanka?
- Burkina Faso, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in humid tropical forest — emissions between Burkina Faso and Sri Lanka?
- 0 kt, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Sri Lanka?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Sri Lanka rank globally for humid tropical forest — emissions?
- Burkina Faso ranks 72nd and Sri Lanka ranks 72nd of 104 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Humid tropical forest — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.