Samoa vs Sri Lanka: Humid tropical forest — Emissions (N2O)
Samoa
0 kt
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 kt
in 2024
Samoa rank
72nd
Sri Lanka rank
72nd
Humid tropical forest — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Samoa
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Samoa ranks 72nd and Sri Lanka ranks 72nd of 218 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Samoa averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0014 kt | 0.014 kt | 0.0126 kt | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0021 kt | 0.002 kt | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0.0011 kt | 0.0006 kt | 0.0006 kt | Samoa |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher humid tropical forest — emissions, Samoa or Sri Lanka?
- Samoa, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in humid tropical forest — emissions between Samoa and Sri Lanka?
- 0 kt, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Sri Lanka?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Samoa and Sri Lanka rank globally for humid tropical forest — emissions?
- Samoa ranks 72nd and Sri Lanka ranks 72nd of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Humid tropical forest — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.