Brazil vs Congo: Humid tropical forest — Emissions (N2O), per capita (capita N2O)
Brazil
0 kt per person
in 2024
Congo
0 kt per person
in 2024
Brazil rank
7th
Congo rank
6th
Humid tropical forest — Emissions (N2O), per capita (capita N2O) over time
- Brazil
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Brazil, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 18 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.
Brazil ranks 7th and Congo ranks 6th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Congo |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Congo |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Congo |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher humid tropical forest — emissions (n2o), per capita, Brazil or Congo?
- Congo, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Brazil as of 2024.
- What is the difference in humid tropical forest — emissions (n2o), per capita between Brazil and Congo?
- 0 kt per person, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Congo?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Congo rank globally for humid tropical forest — emissions (n2o), per capita?
- Brazil ranks 7th and Congo ranks 6th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Humid tropical forest — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Humid tropical forest — Emissions (N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.