Gambia vs Samoa: Humid tropical forest — Emissions (N2O), per capita (capita N2O)
Gambia
0 kt per person
in 2024
Samoa
0 kt per person
in 2024
Gambia rank
65th
Samoa rank
65th
Humid tropical forest — Emissions (N2O), per capita (capita N2O) over time
- Gambia
- Samoa
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Samoa, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Gambia ahead.
Gambia ranks 65th and Samoa ranks 65th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 2 and Samoa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Gambia |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Gambia |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Samoa |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher humid tropical forest — emissions (n2o), per capita, Gambia or Samoa?
- Gambia, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Samoa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in humid tropical forest — emissions (n2o), per capita between Gambia and Samoa?
- 0 kt per person, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Samoa?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Gambia and Samoa rank globally for humid tropical forest — emissions (n2o), per capita?
- Gambia ranks 65th and Samoa ranks 65th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Humid tropical forest — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Humid tropical forest — Emissions (N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.