South Africa vs Sudan: Humid tropical forest — Emissions (N2O), per capita (capita N2O)
South Africa
0 kt per person
in 2024
Sudan
0 kt per person
in 2024
South Africa rank
59th
Sudan rank
61st
Humid tropical forest — Emissions (N2O), per capita (capita N2O) over time
- South Africa
- Sudan
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Sudan, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.5 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Africa ahead.
South Africa ranks 59th and Sudan ranks 61st of 185 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | South Africa |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher humid tropical forest — emissions (n2o), per capita, South Africa or Sudan?
- South Africa, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in humid tropical forest — emissions (n2o), per capita between South Africa and Sudan?
- 0 kt per person, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do South Africa and Sudan rank globally for humid tropical forest — emissions (n2o), per capita?
- South Africa ranks 59th and Sudan ranks 61st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Humid tropical forest — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Humid tropical forest — Emissions (N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.