Australia vs Congo: Index of carbon stocks in forests, Index (Not Applicable)
Australia
98.41
in 2023
Congo
98.25
in 2023
Australia rank
114th
Congo rank
116th
Index of carbon stocks in forests, Index (Not Applicable) over time
- Australia
- Congo
How they compare
Australia currently reports 98.41 against 98.25 in Congo, a difference of 0.16.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Congo ahead.
Australia ranks 114th and Congo ranks 116th of 196 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 99.46 | 99.81 | 0.3539 | Congo |
| 2000s | 98.37 | 99.33 | 0.9577 | Congo |
| 2010s | 98.26 | 98.78 | 0.529 | Congo |
| 2020s | 98.41 | 98.35 | 0.0627 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher index of carbon stocks in forests, index, Australia or Congo?
- Australia, at 98.41 against 98.25 in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in index of carbon stocks in forests, index between Australia and Congo?
- 0.16, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Congo?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Australia and Congo rank globally for index of carbon stocks in forests, index?
- Australia ranks 114th and Congo ranks 116th of 196 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Index of carbon stocks in forests, Index (Not Applicable). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset provides information on global climate and weather patterns, providing insights into temperature variations, land cover accounts, and shifts in mean sea levels.