China, Hong Kong SAR vs United Republic of Tanzania: IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 3.95 % change on previous year against 3.2 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0.75 % change on previous year.
That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.2 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.
The two have swapped places 21 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 57th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 55th of 233 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 3 and United Republic of Tanzania in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.11 % change on previous year | 2.55 % change on previous year | 1.56 % change on previous year | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 1970s | 3.69 % change on previous year | 2.52 % change on previous year | 1.17 % change on previous year | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 1980s | -2.89 % change on previous year | 1.04 % change on previous year | 3.93 % change on previous year | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 1990s | -8.51 % change on previous year | 2.68 % change on previous year | 11.2 % change on previous year | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 2000s | 2.62 % change on previous year | 1.99 % change on previous year | 0.6368 % change on previous year | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2010s | 3.04 % change on previous year | 4.74 % change on previous year | 1.7 % change on previous year | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 2020s | -1.05 % change on previous year | 5.1 % change on previous year | 6.15 % change on previous year | United Republic of Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ipcc agriculture — direct emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, China, Hong Kong SAR or United Republic of Tanzania?
- United Republic of Tanzania, at 3.95 % change on previous year against 3.2 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — direct emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between China, Hong Kong SAR and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 0.75 % change on previous year, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for ipcc agriculture — direct emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 57th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 55th of 233 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.