Brazil vs South Sudan: IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O), per capita
Brazil
0 kt per person
in 2023
South Sudan
0 kt per person
in 2023
Brazil rank
10th
South Sudan rank
8th
IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O), per capita over time
- Brazil
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Brazil, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 10th and South Sudan ranks 8th of 187 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ipcc agriculture — direct emissions (n2o), per capita, Brazil or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Brazil as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — direct emissions (n2o), per capita between Brazil and South Sudan?
- 0 kt per person, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and South Sudan rank globally for ipcc agriculture — direct emissions (n2o), per capita?
- Brazil ranks 10th and South Sudan ranks 8th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.