How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sri Lanka?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cuba vs Sri Lanka: IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Cuba

0.0001 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Sri Lanka

0.0001 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Cuba rank

65th

Sri Lanka rank

67th

IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

Cuba
Sri Lanka

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 65th and Sri Lanka ranks 67th of 187 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 6 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cuba	Sri Lanka	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	Cuba
1970s	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	Cuba
1980s	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	Cuba
1990s	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Cuba
2000s	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Cuba
2010s	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Cuba
2020s	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0.0001 kt per square kilometre	0 kt per square kilometre	Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — direct emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Cuba or Sri Lanka?: Cuba, at 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — direct emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Cuba and Sri Lanka?: 0 kt per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sri Lanka?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Sri Lanka rank globally for ipcc agriculture — direct emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?: Cuba ranks 65th and Sri Lanka ranks 67th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Sri Lanka: IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-direct-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/cuba/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-direct-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/cuba/sri-lanka/">Cuba vs Sri Lanka: IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 188 places, 10,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 20 September 2026

IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.