Ecuador vs Malaysia: IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Ecuador
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Malaysia
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
114th
Malaysia rank
115th

IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Malaysia
00000196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Malaysia, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 114th and Malaysia ranks 115th of 187 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Malaysia Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — direct emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Malaysia?
Ecuador, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Malaysia as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — direct emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Malaysia?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malaysia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Malaysia rank globally for ipcc agriculture — direct emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 114th and Malaysia ranks 115th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Malaysia: IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-direct-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-direct-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/malaysia/">Ecuador vs Malaysia: IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 10,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.