Kiribati vs Norway: IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Kiribati
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati rank
157th
Norway rank
156th

IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Kiribati
  • Norway
00000196119922023

How they compare

Norway currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

Kiribati ranks 157th and Norway ranks 156th of 187 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Norway
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Norway
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Norway
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Norway
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Norway
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Norway
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — direct emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Kiribati or Norway?
Norway, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — direct emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Kiribati and Norway?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Norway?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Norway rank globally for ipcc agriculture — direct emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
Kiribati ranks 157th and Norway ranks 156th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Norway: IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-direct-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-direct-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/norway/">Kiribati vs Norway: IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 10,684 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IPCC Agriculture — Direct emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.