Sao Tome and Principe vs Sri Lanka: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate

Sao Tome and Principe
2.16 % change on previous year
in 2023
Sri Lanka
2.6 % change on previous year
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe rank
49th
Sri Lanka rank
47th

IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Sri Lanka
-20-1001020196219922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 2.6 % change on previous year against 2.16 % change on previous year in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.44 % change on previous year.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.2 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 33 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 49th and Sri Lanka ranks 47th of 234 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s -3.56 % change on previous year 0.7379 % change on previous year 4.3 % change on previous year Sri Lanka
1970s -0.3558 % change on previous year 1.89 % change on previous year 2.25 % change on previous year Sri Lanka
1980s 2.5 % change on previous year 0.2852 % change on previous year 2.21 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 1.46 % change on previous year -1.79 % change on previous year 3.24 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
2000s -1.32 % change on previous year 0.9871 % change on previous year 2.31 % change on previous year Sri Lanka
2010s 1.44 % change on previous year 0.8694 % change on previous year 0.5675 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 1.48 % change on previous year 3.74 % change on previous year 2.26 % change on previous year Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate, Sao Tome and Principe or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 2.6 % change on previous year against 2.16 % change on previous year in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate between Sao Tome and Principe and Sri Lanka?
0.44 % change on previous year, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Sri Lanka?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Sri Lanka rank globally for ipcc agriculture — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 49th and Sri Lanka ranks 47th of 234 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Sri Lanka: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/sao-tome-and-principe/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/sao-tome-and-principe/sri-lanka/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Sri Lanka: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
267 places, 14,818 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.