Australia and New Zealand vs Bolivia (Plurinational State of): IPCC Agriculture — Emissions

Australia and New Zealand
5,503 kt
in 2023
Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
885.96 kt
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
8th
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank
9th

IPCC Agriculture — Emissions over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 5,503 kt against 885.96 kt in Bolivia (Plurinational State of), a difference of 4,617 kt.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 6.2 times Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 8th and Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 9th of 225 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Difference Ahead
1960s 3,741 kt 232.27 kt 3,508 kt Australia and New Zealand
1970s 4,382 kt 330.34 kt 4,052 kt Australia and New Zealand
1980s 4,013 kt 424.74 kt 3,588 kt Australia and New Zealand
1990s 5,019 kt 489.88 kt 4,529 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 5,030 kt 611.68 kt 4,418 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 4,635 kt 737.59 kt 3,898 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 4,172 kt 843.53 kt 3,328 kt Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — emissions, Australia and New Zealand or Bolivia (Plurinational State of)?
Australia and New Zealand, at 5,503 kt against 885.96 kt in Bolivia (Plurinational State of) as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — emissions between Australia and New Zealand and Bolivia (Plurinational State of)?
4,617 kt, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Bolivia (Plurinational State of)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank globally for ipcc agriculture — emissions?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 8th and Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 9th of 225 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Bolivia (Plurinational State of): IPCC Agriculture — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/">Australia and New Zealand vs Bolivia (Plurinational State of): IPCC Agriculture — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
279 places, 15,374 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf