Colombia vs Sudan: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions over time
- Colombia
- Sudan
How they compare
Colombia currently reports 1,986 kt against 1,883 kt in Sudan, a difference of 103 kt.
That makes Colombia's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Colombia ranks 20th and Sudan ranks 22nd of 225 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,645 kt | 1,873 kt | 227.68 kt | Sudan |
| 2020s | 1,969 kt | 1,884 kt | 84.96 kt | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ipcc agriculture — emissions, Colombia or Sudan?
- Colombia, at 1,986 kt against 1,883 kt in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — emissions between Colombia and Sudan?
- 103 kt, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Colombia and Sudan rank globally for ipcc agriculture — emissions?
- Colombia ranks 20th and Sudan ranks 22nd of 225 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf