Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Syrian Arab Republic: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions

Democratic Republic of the Congo
557.09 kt
in 2023
Syrian Arab Republic
146.88 kt
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
11th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
13th

IPCC Agriculture — Emissions over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Syrian Arab Republic
0200400600196119922023

How they compare

Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 557.09 kt against 146.88 kt in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 410.21 kt.

That makes Democratic Republic of the Congo's figure about 3.8 times Syrian Arab Republic's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 11th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 13th of 22 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Democratic Republic of the Congo averaged higher in 4 and Syrian Arab Republic in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Syrian Arab Republic Difference Ahead
1960s 45.9 kt 53.19 kt 7.29 kt Syrian Arab Republic
1970s 62.07 kt 65.13 kt 3.06 kt Syrian Arab Republic
1980s 74.39 kt 102.82 kt 28.43 kt Syrian Arab Republic
1990s 446.73 kt 111.94 kt 334.79 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2000s 482.19 kt 142.7 kt 339.49 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2010s 524.1 kt 141.56 kt 382.54 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2020s 557.05 kt 140.5 kt 416.55 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — emissions, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Syrian Arab Republic?
Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 557.09 kt against 146.88 kt in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — emissions between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Syrian Arab Republic?
410.21 kt, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Syrian Arab Republic?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for ipcc agriculture — emissions?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 11th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 13th of 22 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Syrian Arab Republic: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/syrian-arab-republic-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/syrian-arab-republic-2/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Syrian Arab Republic: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
279 places, 15,374 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf