Eswatini vs Slovenia: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Eswatini
0 kt per person
in 2023
Slovenia
0 kt per person
in 2023
Eswatini rank
70th
Slovenia rank
69th
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Eswatini
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 70th and Slovenia ranks 69th of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ipcc agriculture — emissions (ch4), per capita, Eswatini or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — emissions (ch4), per capita between Eswatini and Slovenia?
- 0 kt per person, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Slovenia rank globally for ipcc agriculture — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Eswatini ranks 70th and Slovenia ranks 69th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.