Maldives vs Turks and Caicos Islands: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre

Maldives
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Maldives rank
182nd
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
183rd

IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre over time

  • Maldives
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00000196119922023

How they compare

Maldives currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Maldives ranks 182nd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 183rd of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Maldives averaged higher in 2 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Maldives Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Maldives
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Maldives

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre, Maldives or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Maldives, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre between Maldives and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Maldives ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Turks and Caicos Islands?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Maldives and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for ipcc agriculture — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre?
Maldives ranks 182nd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 183rd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Maldives vs Turks and Caicos Islands: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-ch4-per-square-kilometre/maldives/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-ch4-per-square-kilometre/maldives/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Maldives vs Turks and Caicos Islands: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 11,186 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CH4) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.