China, Macao SAR vs East Timor: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate

China, Macao SAR
1.09 % change on previous year
in 2023
East Timor
1.17 % change on previous year
in 2023
China, Macao SAR rank
87th
East Timor rank
84th

IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate over time

  • China, Macao SAR
  • East Timor
-2002040196219922023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 1.17 % change on previous year against 1.09 % change on previous year in China, Macao SAR, a difference of 0.08 % change on previous year.

That makes East Timor's figure about 1.1 times China, Macao SAR's.

The two have swapped places 31 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was China, Macao SAR ahead.

China, Macao SAR ranks 87th and East Timor ranks 84th of 238 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Macao SAR averaged higher in 3 and East Timor in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao SAR East Timor Difference Ahead
1960s 3.81 % change on previous year 1.12 % change on previous year 2.68 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR
1970s 5.49 % change on previous year -5.08 % change on previous year 10.57 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR
1980s 0.2428 % change on previous year 2.59 % change on previous year 2.35 % change on previous year East Timor
1990s 3.19 % change on previous year 4.13 % change on previous year 0.945 % change on previous year East Timor
2000s 1.55 % change on previous year 5.17 % change on previous year 3.62 % change on previous year East Timor
2010s 1.08 % change on previous year 2.23 % change on previous year 1.14 % change on previous year East Timor
2020s 0.9952 % change on previous year 0.2663 % change on previous year 0.7289 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate, China, Macao SAR or East Timor?
East Timor, at 1.17 % change on previous year against 1.09 % change on previous year in China, Macao SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate between China, Macao SAR and East Timor?
0.08 % change on previous year, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and East Timor?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do China, Macao SAR and East Timor rank globally for ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate?
China, Macao SAR ranks 87th and East Timor ranks 84th of 238 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao SAR vs East Timor: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/china-macao-sar/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/china-macao-sar/timor-leste/">China, Macao SAR vs East Timor: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
271 places, 14,990 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.