Latvia vs Serbia: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP
Latvia
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Serbia
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Latvia rank
97th
Serbia rank
95th
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP over time
- Latvia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 97th and Serbia ranks 95th of 198 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit of gdp, Latvia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit of gdp between Latvia and Serbia?
- 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Serbia rank globally for ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit of gdp?
- Latvia ranks 97th and Serbia ranks 95th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.