Equatorial Guinea vs Maldives: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square

Equatorial Guinea
0.0005 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Maldives
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
181st
Maldives rank
182nd

IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Maldives
000000.001196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0005 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Maldives, a difference of 0.0005 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 50.7 times Maldives's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 181st and Maldives ranks 182nd of 201 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Maldives Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.0003 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per square, Equatorial Guinea or Maldives?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0005 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Maldives as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per square between Equatorial Guinea and Maldives?
0.0005 kt per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Maldives?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Maldives rank globally for ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per square?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 181st and Maldives ranks 182nd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Maldives: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/maldives/">Equatorial Guinea vs Maldives: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 11,186 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.