Trinidad and Tobago vs Zimbabwe: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square

Trinidad and Tobago
0.0205 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0196 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago rank
115th
Zimbabwe rank
117th

IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square over time

  • Trinidad and Tobago
  • Zimbabwe
0.010.020.03196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 0.0205 kt per square kilometre against 0.0196 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0009 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Trinidad and Tobago ranks 115th and Zimbabwe ranks 117th of 201 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Trinidad and Tobago Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0247 kt per square kilometre 0.0102 kt per square kilometre 0.0145 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0.0321 kt per square kilometre 0.0159 kt per square kilometre 0.0162 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0.0283 kt per square kilometre 0.0153 kt per square kilometre 0.013 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0.0218 kt per square kilometre 0.0183 kt per square kilometre 0.0035 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0.0199 kt per square kilometre 0.019 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0.0203 kt per square kilometre 0.0193 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0.0202 kt per square kilometre 0.0185 kt per square kilometre 0.0017 kt per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per square, Trinidad and Tobago or Zimbabwe?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 0.0205 kt per square kilometre against 0.0196 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per square between Trinidad and Tobago and Zimbabwe?
0.0009 kt per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Trinidad and Tobago and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Trinidad and Tobago and Zimbabwe rank globally for ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per square?
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 115th and Zimbabwe ranks 117th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trinidad and Tobago vs Zimbabwe: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-per-square-kilometre/trinidad-and-tobago/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-per-square-kilometre/trinidad-and-tobago/zimbabwe/">Trinidad and Tobago vs Zimbabwe: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 11,186 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.