Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Republic of Moldova: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) — UNFCCC

Democratic Republic of the Congo
28,168 kt
in 2010
Republic of Moldova
794.31 kt
in 2013
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
2nd
Republic of Moldova rank
4th

IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) — UNFCCC over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Republic of Moldova
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199220022013

How they compare

Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 28,168 kt against 794.31 kt in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 27,374 kt.

That makes Democratic Republic of the Congo's figure about 35.5 times Republic of Moldova's.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Democratic Republic of the Congo has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 2nd and Republic of Moldova ranks 4th of 4 countries.

Democratic Republic of the Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Republic of Moldova Difference Ahead
1990s 41,441 kt 1,858 kt 39,583 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2000s 38,793 kt 1,318 kt 37,475 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2010s 28,168 kt 878.67 kt 27,289 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) — unfccc, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Republic of Moldova?
Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 28,168 kt against 794.31 kt in Republic of Moldova as of 2010.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) — unfccc between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Republic of Moldova?
27,374 kt, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Republic of Moldova?
7 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2010.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Republic of Moldova rank globally for ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) — unfccc?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 2nd and Republic of Moldova ranks 4th of 4 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Republic of Moldova: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) — UNFCCC. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-unfccc/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/republic-of-moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-co2eq-from-ch4-ar5-unfccc/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/republic-of-moldova/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Republic of Moldova: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) — UNFCCC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) — UNFCCC
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
96 places, 2,031 data points, 1990–2020
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf