Nauru vs Nauru: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) — UNFCCC
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) — UNFCCC over time
- Nauru
- Nauru
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 0.77 kt against 0.77 kt in Nauru, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Nauru ranks 95th and Nauru ranks 95th of 97 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.55 kt | 6.55 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2000s | 1.21 kt | 1.21 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2010s | 0.77 kt | 0.77 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) — unfccc, Nauru or Nauru?
- Nauru, at 0.77 kt against 0.77 kt in Nauru as of 2010.
- What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) — unfccc between Nauru and Nauru?
- 0 kt, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Nauru?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2010.
- How do Nauru and Nauru rank globally for ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5) — unfccc?
- Nauru ranks 95th and Nauru ranks 95th of 97 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) — UNFCCC. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf