Cote d'Ivoire vs South Africa: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square

Cote d'Ivoire
0.01 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
0.0111 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Cote d'Ivoire rank
137th
South Africa rank
134th

IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • South Africa
00.0030.0050.0070.010.013196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0.0111 kt per square kilometre against 0.01 kt per square kilometre in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.0011 kt per square kilometre.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Cote d'Ivoire's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 137th and South Africa ranks 134th of 201 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0011 kt per square kilometre 0.008 kt per square kilometre 0.0068 kt per square kilometre South Africa
1970s 0.0019 kt per square kilometre 0.0088 kt per square kilometre 0.0069 kt per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 0.0026 kt per square kilometre 0.0095 kt per square kilometre 0.0069 kt per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 0.0067 kt per square kilometre 0.0108 kt per square kilometre 0.0041 kt per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 0.0079 kt per square kilometre 0.0109 kt per square kilometre 0.003 kt per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 0.008 kt per square kilometre 0.0107 kt per square kilometre 0.0027 kt per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 0.0092 kt per square kilometre 0.0112 kt per square kilometre 0.002 kt per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square, Cote d'Ivoire or South Africa?
South Africa, at 0.0111 kt per square kilometre against 0.01 kt per square kilometre in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square between Cote d'Ivoire and South Africa?
0.0011 kt per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and South Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and South Africa rank globally for ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 137th and South Africa ranks 134th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cote d'Ivoire vs South Africa: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/south-africa/">Cote d'Ivoire vs South Africa: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 11,244 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.