French Polynesia vs Namibia: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square

French Polynesia
0.0034 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0036 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
French Polynesia rank
165th
Namibia rank
163rd

IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Namibia
0.0020.0040.0060.008196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0036 kt per square kilometre against 0.0034 kt per square kilometre in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.0002 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times French Polynesia's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was French Polynesia ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 165th and Namibia ranks 163rd of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0027 kt per square kilometre 0.0017 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre French Polynesia
1970s 0.0023 kt per square kilometre 0.0017 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre French Polynesia
1980s 0.0031 kt per square kilometre 0.0015 kt per square kilometre 0.0017 kt per square kilometre French Polynesia
1990s 0.0033 kt per square kilometre 0.0035 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 0.0035 kt per square kilometre 0.0038 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.0034 kt per square kilometre 0.0041 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.0036 kt per square kilometre 0.0038 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square, French Polynesia or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.0036 kt per square kilometre against 0.0034 kt per square kilometre in French Polynesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square between French Polynesia and Namibia?
0.0002 kt per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do French Polynesia and Namibia rank globally for ipcc agriculture — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per square?
French Polynesia ranks 165th and Namibia ranks 163rd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Namibia: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/french-polynesia/namibia/">French Polynesia vs Namibia: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 11,244 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.