Sao Tome and Principe vs Sri Lanka: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate

Sao Tome and Principe
2.42 % change on previous year
in 2023
Sri Lanka
2.18 % change on previous year
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe rank
68th
Sri Lanka rank
71st

IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Sri Lanka
-40-2002040196219922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 2.42 % change on previous year against 2.18 % change on previous year in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.24 % change on previous year.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 25 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 68th and Sri Lanka ranks 71st of 235 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 5 and Sri Lanka in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s -2.72 % change on previous year 2.06 % change on previous year 4.78 % change on previous year Sri Lanka
1970s 0.3022 % change on previous year 2.41 % change on previous year 2.1 % change on previous year Sri Lanka
1980s 2.64 % change on previous year 2.13 % change on previous year 0.5078 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 2.53 % change on previous year 1.62 % change on previous year 0.9168 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 6.86 % change on previous year 1.52 % change on previous year 5.35 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 3.22 % change on previous year 0.5652 % change on previous year 2.65 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 2.16 % change on previous year 1.2 % change on previous year 0.9505 % change on previous year Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Sao Tome and Principe or Sri Lanka?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 2.42 % change on previous year against 2.18 % change on previous year in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Sao Tome and Principe and Sri Lanka?
0.24 % change on previous year, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Sri Lanka?
62 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2023.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Sri Lanka rank globally for ipcc agriculture — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 68th and Sri Lanka ranks 71st of 235 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Sri Lanka: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/sao-tome-and-principe/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/sao-tome-and-principe/sri-lanka/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Sri Lanka: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
268 places, 14,958 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.