Congo vs Kiribati: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Congo
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
164th
Kiribati rank
162nd

IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Kiribati
0000196119922023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kiribati ahead.

Congo ranks 164th and Kiribati ranks 162nd of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Kiribati in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Kiribati Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Kiribati
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Kiribati
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Kiribati
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Congo or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Congo and Kiribati?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Kiribati?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Kiribati rank globally for ipcc agriculture — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 164th and Kiribati ranks 162nd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Kiribati: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/kiribati/">Congo vs Kiribati: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 11,244 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.