Cuba vs Sri Lanka: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Cuba
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
0.0001 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
78th
Sri Lanka rank
75th

IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • Sri Lanka
000196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 78th and Sri Lanka ranks 75th of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 6 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Cuba or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 0.0001 kt per square kilometre against 0.0001 kt per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Cuba and Sri Lanka?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Sri Lanka rank globally for ipcc agriculture — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 78th and Sri Lanka ranks 75th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Sri Lanka: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/cuba/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/cuba/sri-lanka/">Cuba vs Sri Lanka: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 11,244 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.