Nauru vs Zimbabwe: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Nauru
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Nauru rank
128th
Zimbabwe rank
129th

IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Nauru
  • Zimbabwe
0000196119922023

How they compare

Nauru currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Nauru ranks 128th and Zimbabwe ranks 129th of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nauru Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Nauru
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Nauru or Zimbabwe?
Nauru, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Nauru and Zimbabwe?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Nauru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Nauru and Zimbabwe rank globally for ipcc agriculture — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
Nauru ranks 128th and Zimbabwe ranks 129th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nauru vs Zimbabwe: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/naoero/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/naoero/zimbabwe/">Nauru vs Zimbabwe: IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 11,244 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IPCC Agriculture — Emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.