Belarus vs Cuba: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP

Belarus
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Cuba
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2020
Belarus rank
76th
Cuba rank
78th

IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP over time

  • Belarus
  • Cuba
00000197019962023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Cuba, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 76th and Cuba ranks 78th of 181 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Cuba in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Cuba Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Belarus
2000s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Belarus
2010s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Cuba
2020s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp, Belarus or Cuba?
Belarus, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp between Belarus and Cuba?
0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Cuba?
29 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2020.
How do Belarus and Cuba rank globally for ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp?
Belarus ranks 76th and Cuba ranks 78th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Cuba: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-unit-of-gdp/belarus/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-unit-of-gdp/belarus/cuba/">Belarus vs Cuba: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP
Unit
kt per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
182 places, 9,743 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.