China vs Latvia: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP

China
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Latvia
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
China rank
122nd
Latvia rank
124th

IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP over time

  • China
  • Latvia
000000196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1995 it was China ahead.

China ranks 122nd and Latvia ranks 124th of 181 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP China
2000s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP China
2010s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP China
2020s 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP 0 kt per US$ of GDP Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp, China or Latvia?
China, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp between China and Latvia?
0 kt per US$ of GDP, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do China and Latvia rank globally for ipcc agriculture — indirect emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp?
China ranks 122nd and Latvia ranks 124th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Latvia: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-unit-of-gdp/china/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ipcc-agriculture-indirect-emissions-n2o-per-unit-of-gdp/china/latvia/">China vs Latvia: IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP
Unit
kt per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
182 places, 9,743 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IPCC Agriculture — Indirect emissions (N2O) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.