Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs New Zealand: IPPU — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2.04 % change on previous year
in 2023
New Zealand
5.05 % change on previous year
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
10th
New Zealand rank
8th

IPPU — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • New Zealand
-1000100200300400196219922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 5.05 % change on previous year against 2.04 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 3.01 % change on previous year.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 2.5 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1988 it was New Zealand ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 10th and New Zealand ranks 8th of 33 groups.

Across the 5 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) New Zealand Difference Ahead
1980s 7.06 % change on previous year 367.27 % change on previous year 360.22 % change on previous year New Zealand
1990s -1.22 % change on previous year 24.08 % change on previous year 25.3 % change on previous year New Zealand
2000s -7.8 % change on previous year -1.99 % change on previous year 5.81 % change on previous year New Zealand
2010s 14.67 % change on previous year 9.35 % change on previous year 5.32 % change on previous year Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s -9.38 % change on previous year -5.16 % change on previous year 4.23 % change on previous year New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ippu — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 5.05 % change on previous year against 2.04 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in ippu — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and New Zealand?
3.01 % change on previous year, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and New Zealand?
35 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and New Zealand rank globally for ippu — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 10th and New Zealand ranks 8th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IPPU — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs New Zealand: IPPU — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ippu-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ippu-emissions-ch4-annual-growth-rate/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/new-zealand/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs New Zealand: IPPU — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPPU — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
149 places, 7,173 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in IPPU — Emissions (CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.