Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): IPPU — Emissions

Australia and New Zealand
3.92 kt
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2.88 kt
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
28th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
26th

IPPU — Emissions over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
02468196119922023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 3.92 kt against 2.88 kt in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 1.04 kt.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.4 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 28th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 26th of 148 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 1.94 kt 0.7353 kt 1.2 kt Australia and New Zealand
1970s 1.18 kt 0.9299 kt 0.251 kt Australia and New Zealand
1980s 0.7906 kt 0.3619 kt 0.4287 kt Australia and New Zealand
1990s 4.89 kt 1.32 kt 3.57 kt Australia and New Zealand
2000s 3.73 kt 2.46 kt 1.27 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 4.55 kt 2.95 kt 1.6 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 4.07 kt 3.16 kt 0.9106 kt Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ippu — emissions, Australia and New Zealand or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Australia and New Zealand, at 3.92 kt against 2.88 kt in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in ippu — emissions between Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
1.04 kt, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for ippu — emissions?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 28th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 26th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): IPPU — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ippu-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ippu-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): IPPU — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPPU — Emissions (CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
181 places, 10,289 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf