Azerbaijan vs Gabon: IPPU — Emissions
IPPU — Emissions over time
- Azerbaijan
- Gabon
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 0.0426 kt against 0.0407 kt in Gabon, a difference of 0.0019 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 81st and Gabon ranks 82nd of 129 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 3 and Gabon in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Gabon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0149 kt | 0 kt | 0.0149 kt | Azerbaijan |
| 2000s | 0.0224 kt | 0 kt | 0.0224 kt | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 0.0242 kt | 0.015 kt | 0.0092 kt | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 0.0394 kt | 0.0407 kt | 0.0013 kt | Gabon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ippu — emissions, Azerbaijan or Gabon?
- Azerbaijan, at 0.0426 kt against 0.0407 kt in Gabon as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ippu — emissions between Azerbaijan and Gabon?
- 0.0019 kt, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Gabon?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Gabon rank globally for ippu — emissions?
- Azerbaijan ranks 81st and Gabon ranks 82nd of 129 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf