Cyprus vs Polynesia: IPPU — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1
IPPU — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Cyprus
- Polynesia
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Polynesia, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Polynesia has been ahead every year.
Cyprus ranks 104th and Polynesia ranks 104th of 139 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 1970s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 1980s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ippu — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1, Cyprus or Polynesia?
- Cyprus, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Polynesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ippu — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1 between Cyprus and Polynesia?
- 0 kt, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Polynesia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cyprus and Polynesia rank globally for ippu — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1?
- Cyprus ranks 104th and Polynesia ranks 104th of 139 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf