Czechia vs Myanmar: IPPU — Emissions
IPPU — Emissions over time
- Czechia
- Myanmar
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0.469 kt against 0.368 kt in Myanmar, a difference of 0.101 kt.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.3 times Myanmar's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 62nd and Myanmar ranks 64th of 148 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.5543 kt | 0.293 kt | 0.2613 kt | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0.584 kt | 0.1537 kt | 0.4303 kt | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.5312 kt | 0.3212 kt | 0.21 kt | Czechia |
| 2020s | 0.494 kt | 0.3752 kt | 0.1188 kt | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ippu — emissions, Czechia or Myanmar?
- Czechia, at 0.469 kt against 0.368 kt in Myanmar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ippu — emissions between Czechia and Myanmar?
- 0.101 kt, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Myanmar?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Myanmar rank globally for ippu — emissions?
- Czechia ranks 62nd and Myanmar ranks 64th of 148 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf