Ecuador vs Latvia: IPPU — Emissions
IPPU — Emissions over time
- Ecuador
- Latvia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.0001 kt against 0 kt in Latvia, a difference of 0.0001 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 108th and Latvia ranks 110th of 148 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0248 kt | 0.0247 kt | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0417 kt | 0.0416 kt | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0152 kt | 0.0151 kt | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | 0.0001 kt | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ippu — emissions, Ecuador or Latvia?
- Ecuador, at 0.0001 kt against 0 kt in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ippu — emissions between Ecuador and Latvia?
- 0.0001 kt, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Latvia rank globally for ippu — emissions?
- Ecuador ranks 108th and Latvia ranks 110th of 148 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf