Ecuador vs Turkmenistan: IPPU — Emissions
IPPU — Emissions over time
- Ecuador
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.0001 kt against 0.0001 kt in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Turkmenistan has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 108th and Turkmenistan ranks 108th of 148 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0002 kt | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2010s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ippu — emissions, Ecuador or Turkmenistan?
- Ecuador, at 0.0001 kt against 0.0001 kt in Turkmenistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ippu — emissions between Ecuador and Turkmenistan?
- 0 kt, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Turkmenistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Turkmenistan rank globally for ippu — emissions?
- Ecuador ranks 108th and Turkmenistan ranks 108th of 148 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf