Equatorial Guinea vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): IPPU — Emissions

Equatorial Guinea
2.11 kt
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
0.2845 kt
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
31st
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
28th

IPPU — Emissions over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
0123196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 2.11 kt against 0.2845 kt in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 1.83 kt.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 7.4 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 31st and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 28th of 129 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 0 kt 1.5 kt 1.5 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1970s 0 kt 1.77 kt 1.77 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1980s 0 kt 0.754 kt 0.754 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1990s 0 kt 0.6229 kt 0.6229 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 1.42 kt 0.4844 kt 0.9366 kt Equatorial Guinea
2010s 2.7 kt 0.3194 kt 2.38 kt Equatorial Guinea
2020s 2.42 kt 0.2752 kt 2.14 kt Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ippu — emissions, Equatorial Guinea or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Equatorial Guinea, at 2.11 kt against 0.2845 kt in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in ippu — emissions between Equatorial Guinea and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
1.83 kt, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for ippu — emissions?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 31st and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 28th of 129 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): IPPU — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ippu-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/equatorial-guinea/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ippu-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/equatorial-guinea/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Equatorial Guinea vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): IPPU — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPPU — Emissions (CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
173 places, 9,847 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf