Holy See vs Latvia: IPPU — Emissions (CH4)
IPPU — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Holy See
- Latvia
How they compare
Holy See currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Holy See ranks 110th and Latvia ranks 110th of 148 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Holy See | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0.0248 kt | 0.0248 kt | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0417 kt | 0.0417 kt | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0152 kt | 0.0152 kt | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ippu — emissions, Holy See or Latvia?
- Holy See, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ippu — emissions between Holy See and Latvia?
- 0 kt, with Holy See ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Holy See and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Holy See and Latvia rank globally for ippu — emissions?
- Holy See ranks 110th and Latvia ranks 110th of 148 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf