Which has higher ippu — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp, Brunei or Trinidad and Tobago?

Trinidad and Tobago, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Brunei as of 2023.

What is the difference in ippu — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp between Brunei and Trinidad and Tobago?

0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Trinidad and Tobago?

59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as IPPU — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Brunei vs Trinidad and Tobago: IPPU — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP

Brunei

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Trinidad and Tobago

0 kt per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Brunei rank

2nd

Trinidad and Tobago rank

1st

IPPU — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP over time

Brunei
Trinidad and Tobago

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Brunei, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.2 times Brunei's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Brunei ranks 2nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 119 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brunei averaged higher in 2 and Trinidad and Tobago in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Brunei	Trinidad and Tobago	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	—
1970s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Trinidad and Tobago
1980s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Trinidad and Tobago
1990s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Trinidad and Tobago
2000s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Trinidad and Tobago
2010s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Brunei
2020s	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	0 kt per US$ of GDP	Brunei

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ippu — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp, Brunei or Trinidad and Tobago?: Trinidad and Tobago, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Brunei as of 2023.
What is the difference in ippu — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp between Brunei and Trinidad and Tobago?: 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Trinidad and Tobago?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Brunei and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for ippu — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp?: Brunei ranks 2nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 119 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as IPPU — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brunei vs Trinidad and Tobago: IPPU — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ippu-emissions-ch4-per-unit-of-gdp/brunei-darussalam/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ippu-emissions-ch4-per-unit-of-gdp/brunei-darussalam/trinidad-and-tobago/">Brunei vs Trinidad and Tobago: IPPU — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: IPPU — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP
Unit: kt per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 120 places, 6,317 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

IPPU — Emissions (CH4) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.