Armenia vs Mongolia: IPPU — Emissions (CO2)
IPPU — Emissions (CO2) over time
- Armenia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 615 kt against 605 kt in Armenia, a difference of 10 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 137th and Mongolia ranks 135th of 232 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 3 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 140.82 kt | 53.17 kt | 87.65 kt | Armenia |
| 2000s | 303.2 kt | 87.34 kt | 215.86 kt | Armenia |
| 2010s | 288.4 kt | 250.4 kt | 38 kt | Armenia |
| 2020s | 525.25 kt | 587.75 kt | 62.5 kt | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ippu — emissions, Armenia or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 615 kt against 605 kt in Armenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ippu — emissions between Armenia and Mongolia?
- 10 kt, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Mongolia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Mongolia rank globally for ippu — emissions?
- Armenia ranks 137th and Mongolia ranks 135th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf