Belgium vs Uzbekistan: IPPU — Emissions (CO2)
IPPU — Emissions (CO2) over time
- Belgium
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 7,150 kt against 6,730 kt in Uzbekistan, a difference of 420 kt.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 54th and Uzbekistan ranks 55th of 232 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8,651 kt | 4,737 kt | 3,914 kt | Belgium |
| 2010s | 8,209 kt | 6,598 kt | 1,611 kt | Belgium |
| 2020s | 7,782 kt | 6,915 kt | 867.5 kt | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ippu — emissions, Belgium or Uzbekistan?
- Belgium, at 7,150 kt against 6,730 kt in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ippu — emissions between Belgium and Uzbekistan?
- 420 kt, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Uzbekistan?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Uzbekistan rank globally for ippu — emissions?
- Belgium ranks 54th and Uzbekistan ranks 55th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf