Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: IPPU — Emissions

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
1,630 kt
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
3,070 kt
in 2023
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank
12th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
10th

IPPU — Emissions over time

  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
  • United Republic of Tanzania
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 3,070 kt against 1,630 kt in Bolivia (Plurinational State of), a difference of 1,440 kt.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.9 times Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ahead.

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 12th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 10th of 20 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) averaged higher in 3 and United Republic of Tanzania in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia (Plurinational State of) United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 43.52 kt 49.56 kt 6.03 kt United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 118.46 kt 158.7 kt 40.24 kt United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 207.8 kt 207.6 kt 0.2 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
1990s 423.1 kt 316 kt 107.1 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2000s 686.8 kt 629.2 kt 57.6 kt Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
2010s 1,363 kt 1,468 kt 105.5 kt United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 1,508 kt 2,852 kt 1,345 kt United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ippu — emissions, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 3,070 kt against 1,630 kt in Bolivia (Plurinational State of) as of 2023.
What is the difference in ippu — emissions between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and United Republic of Tanzania?
1,440 kt, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for ippu — emissions?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 12th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 10th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: IPPU — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ippu-emissions-co2-fao-tier-1/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/ippu-emissions-co2-fao-tier-1/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs United Republic of Tanzania: IPPU — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IPPU — Emissions (CO2)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
253 places, 14,574 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf