Chile vs Croatia: IPPU — Emissions
IPPU — Emissions over time
- Chile
- Croatia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 1,540 kt against 1,340 kt in Chile, a difference of 200 kt.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.
Chile ranks 91st and Croatia ranks 89th of 197 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Croatia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,755 kt | 1,855 kt | 100 kt | Croatia |
| 2000s | 2,681 kt | 2,371 kt | 310 kt | Chile |
| 2010s | 1,539 kt | 2,156 kt | 617 kt | Croatia |
| 2020s | 1,358 kt | 1,790 kt | 432.5 kt | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ippu — emissions, Chile or Croatia?
- Croatia, at 1,540 kt against 1,340 kt in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ippu — emissions between Chile and Croatia?
- 200 kt, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Croatia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Croatia rank globally for ippu — emissions?
- Chile ranks 91st and Croatia ranks 89th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as IPPU — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf